Home // Posts tagged "social control"

Naughty Twitter Trolls

At the outset I should admit: I have paid only scant attention to the details of the recent ermahgerd twitteh trerlls thing wherein a footballer was so incensed by (apparently actually unpleasant and really pretty shitty) messages sent to him on twitter that he has made appeals to the Gummint to find out who it was being so nasty to him, so that they may be punished.

However… Srsly?

We even now have Senator Conroy lambasting Twitter for "treating Australian law with contempt". Rly?

Yes. Really. Because they aren't keen to hand over identifying details of someone who sent nasty offensive messages to someone else. Since when is should a person's taking of offence be any business of police or government? Even if what was said (tweeted) was really terrible, if it wasn't a threat or incitement to violence or similar, then why should authorities be involved? Taking offence doesn't mean you deserve to be protected from whoever you took offence to. It just means you feel offended (which is a pretty useless construct IMO; as much as I admit to not being completely immune to it, I don't think it's ever proved useful).

I think Stephen Fry put it perfectly:

It has no reason to be respected as a phrase

I totally agree that a cry of being offended by something has "no reason to be respected". Certainly not to the point of police and Gummint trying to track down the person who said whatever was taken as offensive. Sure, I am not meaning to excuse unpleasant and hurtful things being slung at anybody, but this? This is stupid.

You will note also, that I am bending language rather unpleasantly to make it clear that it is not the naughty troll who gives offence, but rather the offended party who takes offence. Foolishness.

… But I'm also thinking that – seen in the light of the increasingly Orwellian nature of our societies – there's a disturbing side to it as well.

Active Resistance, Non-compliance, and Civil Disobedience

Yes, more on the “let’s use pepper spray on these kids sitting on the ground where we don’t want them to” story from UC Davis.

First thing that struck me just yesterday: these were apparently UC Davis police. Whut? O_õ Since when do universities have their own police?

And since when did they get paramilitary riot gear like that we have seen in all the footage and photographs?

Messed up.

Second thing was to read (in a number of places, but here it is quoted on the Daily Kos) that what was done is seen as “fairly standard police procedure”.

However, a law enforcement official who watched the clip called the use of force “fairly standard police procedure.”

Charles J. Kelly, a former Baltimore Police Department lieutenant who wrote the department’s use of force guidelines, said pepper spray is a “compliance tool” that can be used on subjects who do not resist, and is preferable to simply lifting protesters.

“When you start picking up human bodies, you risk hurting them,” Kelly said. “Bodies don’t have handles on them.”

After reviewing the video, Kelly said he observed at least two cases of “active resistance” from protesters. In one instance, a woman pulls her arm back from an officer. In the second instance, a protester curls into a ball. Each of those actions could have warranted more force, including baton strikes and pressure-point techniques.

“What I’m looking at is fairly standard police procedure,” Kelly said.

Further, we read why the pepper spray was in fact necessary:

UC Davis Police Chief Annette Spicuzza said the decision to use pepper spray was made at the scene.
“The students had encircled the officers,” she said Saturday. “They needed to exit. They were looking to leave but were unable to get out.”

So, let me see if I have this correct… The police, wearing full riot gear and carrying guns (rubber bullets one presumes) were being cruelly threatened by these students who were menacingly sitting on the ground with their arms linked. Rather than push past them or pick them up and move them out of the way, which might have hurt them, the police – wanting to avoid causing any hurt – decided their best option was to Spray. Fucking. Pepper. Spray. Down. Their. Fucking. Throats.

Y’know, because if they’d lifted them out of the way they might have hurt them.

Several of these students were hospitalized. Others are seriously injured. One of them, forty-five minutes after being pepper-sprayed down his throat, was still coughing up blood.

Just as well nobody lifted him off the ground and moved him.

And as for the notion of “active resistance”, two things:

First: pulling away one’s arm? Curling into a ball? These are instances of “active resistance”? – Which is such a bad thing that it warrants being sprayed in the face with military-grade (reportedly) pepper spray?

Second: so the frak what? So we the people should not resist? Ever? If someone in a uniform tells us to do something it should be an automatic “yes sir no sir three bags frakking full sir”? Screw what you believe in. Screw what is right. If those in power tell you what to do you do it.

Or you get pepper-sprayed in the face.

An excellent article in Salon looks at the roots of the UC-Davis pepper-spraying. One of the points Glenn Greenwald makes in that article is that:

“If a population becomes bullied or intimidated out of exercising rights offered on paper, those rights effectively cease to exist.”

It becomes meaningless to guarantee rights to assemble, and to voice dissent, when to do so means suffering this sort of violent abuse.

So I say: Disobey. Resist. Do not comply.

Sure, don’t go out of your way to do meaningless acts of vandalism or violence or antisocial wossname, but do not kow-tow to those in power. The power structures that feed them were created for a reason, and that reason is was to serve the people. There has been such a perversion of these institutions that clearly, they do not any longer serve that purpose.

If what you are doing is right, keep doing it. Do not comply if told to stop. Resist (peacefully) if your compliance is being forced.

Do not obey.

Police Pepper Spray Peaceful Students

This is abominable. For sitting where one is “not supposed to”, the appropriate response appears to be “spraying the living crap out of your eyes with pepper spray”.

How on earth did we get to this point? How did we let money gain so much power that the greed of the rich became more worthy of defence than the populace? In fact it’s worse than that: it’s not just a failure to defend and serve the populace; it’s actively attacking the populace, in defence of the rich and powerful.

Orwellian Newspeak: “DV”

I walked past a sign this morning outside the train station on my way to work. It’s a sign I’ve walked past quite a few times without noticing it terribly much. This morning I did notice it, and having been reading George Orwell’s 1984 just five minutes earlier, was rather taken by its Newspeak-ness. It reads: “This community does not tolerate domestic violence” – which is of course commendable – and underneath is a phone number for the “DV Hotline”.

On the face of it this seems fine: we shouldn’t tolerate domestic violence, and there should be an easy way for anyone suffering it to get help and support.

However…

Along with the sign, I noticed this morning how terribly Newspeak-ish is the phrase “Domestic Violence” – and worse yet: “DV”. No longer do we talk about assault, emotional cruelty, even rape (within a relationship) or suchlike; it has become “DV in the relationship”.

Words are important. They are the primary means by which we convey not just information, but the very concepts therein. In Orwell’s 1984, the Party use Newspeak to control not just information, but the public’s conception of existence. If there is no way to describe a concept, what happens to that concept. The notion Orwell puts forth through the Party is that without language to express a concept the concept can cease to exist:

‘Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. Already, in the Eleventh Edition, we’re not far from that point. But the process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there’s no reason or excuse for committing thoughtcrime. It’s merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won’t be any need even for that. The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect. Newspeak is Ingsoc and Ingsoc is Newspeak,’ he added with a sort of mystical satisfaction. ‘Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?’

Compare and contrast “DV in the relationship” with “He bashes his wife”. Not only is the latter more accurate and informationally complete, it is more visceral. Upon hearing or reading it there is more empathy evoked; you feel more what is happening. The Newspeak “Domestic Violence” (and especially the short, punchy, and oh-so-catchy “DV”) robs information and emotion from the concept. In fact it changes the concept: in Newspeak (“DV in the relationship”), it is the relationship that appears to be in some odd and undefinable way, at fault; in Oldspeak (“He bashes his wife”) it is clear who is at fault: a violent man.

The more I read 1984, the more I see of it in the world around me. If you have not read it, or haven’t read it for a while, read it.

Read. It. Now.

Labelling Kids

This is a video I was sent a link to by Laurie Monk (from Truth in Shredding). It’s not a guitar vid, but it is very interesting:

It’s a little simplistic (shrinks are bad, mmkay?) and the commenters clearly lack even a basic understanding of the complexities of childhood behaviour and psychiatry’s role, but what is raised is a very important issue – one I do not think my profession is dealing with well at all.

Statistical data collected by Statpress SEOlution (blogcraft).