Home // Posts tagged "science"

Coffee and Hallucinations … RLY?

I have a few things to blog about, but will do my best to pace myself. Today I’ll have a whinge about a “study” (scare quotes intentional) from La Trobe University in Melbourne that purports to show that a high intake of coffee increases a person’s propensity to experience hallucinations. This has of course been taken up by the news media. It’s the perfect medical scare story: everyone’s favourite drug makes you go crazy.

Pleh, I say. And also bah.

First red flag: this is not yet published, but Professor Crowe is giving press releases and interviews to the general media. Not an especially auspicious sign.

So, I can’t check out the details of what was done, including any statistics. I can however comment on what they’ve said in their press release about the experiment:

“The participants were assigned to either a high or a low stress condition and a high or a low caffeine condition on the basis of self-report.”

It gets worse. They didn’t administer caffeine, or even measure intake or serum caffeine levels. Perhaps they asked how many coffees the participants drank, but different types of coffee (brewed, espresso, instant…) differ in their caffeine content, and even with the same sort of coffee, different baristas will give different results (for example, I’d lay good odds there’s a lot more caffeine in one shot from me than in a double shot from almost any cafe in which I’ve observed the barista). There are no details about how they determined whether the person was subject to a high or low stress condition – so we can basically almost discount the stated difference between the groups in the “study”, before we even really begin.

“The participants were then asked to listen to white noise and to report each time they heard Bing Crosby’s rendition of “White Christmas” during the white noise. The song was never played. The results indicated that the interaction of stress and caffeine had a significant effect on the reported frequency of hearing “White Christmas”. The participants with high levels of stress or consumed high levels of caffeine were more likely to hear the song.”

So. Maybe interesting. Not hallucinations though. Not without a lot more detail. At most I suppose we could call them secondary hallucinations (an hallucination triggered by a real perception), but my money’s on illusions/misperceptions. This was done under the guise of a hearing test, and the subjects were led to think White Christmas would be played. Therefore they were listening for it. It is perhaps interesting that (possibly) more highly stressed or caffeinated individuals were more likely to think they heard something, but it expressly does not mean…

“This study also helped to explain the mechanism by which stress may facilitate the symptoms of schizophrenia in non-clinical samples. Caffeine has only recently been reported to increase proneness to hallucinate. ‘The results also support both the diathesis-stress model and the continuum theory of schizophrenia in that stress plays a role in the symptoms of schizophrenia and that everyone, to some degree, can experience these symptoms. This was demonstrated by a significant effect of stress on the occurrence of hallucinatory experiences, or hearing the song.”

Absolute. Rot.

There is no basis – from what has been reported (and only in their press release and news media) – on which to extrapolate illusions when primed to expect a particular experience, to schizophrenia. None. Zip. Nada.

Certainly, stress plays a part in psychotic illness. Certainly it’s plausible to think stimulating the brain might not be the best thing in the world to do, especially if that brain is vulnerable. This wretched (or at best, wretchedly reported) excuse for a study takes us no further than those two basically common-sense statements.

So, go forth and sup your coffee. ;)

20110608-020338.jpg

I Give Up: Apes are Monkeys

This is really interesting (if somewhat hard going): a fascinating discourse on why apes are indeed monkeys. (Hat tip to Gimpyblog for the link.)

I’ve always said not, but I give in. Apes are monkeys…

20110424-083641.jpg

and so are we. ;)

Or in the words of Eddie Izzard: “You’re a fucking monkey, mate!”

Chatting with my Grandmother

I had an enjoyable chat this evening before dinner, with my 90 year old grandmother. Not any sort of stereotypical grandparent-ish chat; no doilies or tea, or Abe Simpson-esque reminiscing. Not at all.

The catalyst for this evening’s chat was a Hubble calendar she had sitting around. We began to talk about the Hubble Deep Field image, and from there we ranged to extra-terrestrial life, interstellar travel, faster-than-light travel – or transmission of information, teleportation and warping space-time, socialism, environmental concerns, future evolutionary possibilities (perhaps via cyborg, since we’ve buggered up natural selection), and even overpopulation and some sort of culling O_o

My grandmother’s pretty awesome really.

F$%^in’ Magnets, How They Work

You might well have heard – and seen the video for – the song “Miracles” by the Insane Clown Posse. When I first saw the vid (I forget where), I didn’t pay very close attention (it being a style of music I hate), and had a reasonably positive reaction to what seemed to be a song expressing joy and wonder at the world around us – though I didn’t much like their choice of words: miracles, and magic, and suchlike.

Subsequently I saw further discussions, pointing out that rather than expressing wonder, ICP are in fact celebrating ignorance and idiocy. Not only do they submit as “miracles” and “magic”, many things that a few minutes online would explain perfectly well (and ok, maybe that’s just a poor choice of words for things they’re saying are wonderful, and should be appreciated), but they go on:

“And I don’t wanna talk to a scientist.
Y’all motherfuckers lying, and getting me pissed.”

Riiiiiiiiight …

Well, I’m not a scientist. Ok, medicine is an applied science, which yes, involves use of the scientific method (but so does (or should) any problem-solving activity), but that doesn’t make me a scientist. I don’t think I’m a lying motherfucker either, so with any luck I won’t get juggalos pissed by this post. There’s one line in that song that seems to have been the most reviled around the interwebz: “Fuckin’ magnets, how do they work?” … so …

… Here’s Richard Feynman explaining magnets … well, after he explains that a question about “why?” is a question that isn’t really answerable sensibly. 8)

With a tip of the magnetic hat to Roger Ebert

Implications of Teleportation

Last night I was watching an episode of Big Bang theory. At the start Sheldon was talking about teleportation, saying the problem is that the original person would be destroyed, then recreated at the destination. Sure, thought I, but that’s not the implication that has occurred to me when I’ve thought about this before.

Yes, I have spent time thinking about this.

Yes. Yes I am a geek.

Moving on ….

If the original is destroyed and recreated, it’d surely be a simple thing to not destroy the original. Then you have two. You take a lump of gold. You teleport it into the other corner of your room, without destroying the original. You do it again and again. Teleportation don that way basically means cloning of objects/animals/whatever.

So teleporting humans would surely mean murder on a grand scale. ;)

Perhaps all the atoms of the subject being teleported would be transported to the destination. Then no cloning? But why not? If you have a stash of atoms close at hand (like ummm the world, given that atoms make up everything) you can create/recreate the subject from that. Also, transmitting all the subject’s matter would be a more difficult and costly proposition than just the information on how to put it together – which would have to accompany even the subject’s original matter, so you wouldn’t save anything there. And finally, I would think that sending all that matter through space would run the risk of contamination – like in the movie The Fly ;)

So a few problems with that.

How else could we travel super-fast or for all intents and purposes instantaneously? A bloke I knew years ago was keen on “accelerating gravity” (his words) as propulsion. Kind of an interesting idea. I don’t know how he elaborated it, but I got to thinking (geek, remember? :P ). Gravity affects/warps space-time, right? For the extreme of that, look at black holes. So, could we – once we understand gravity sufficiently, deliberately warp space time so that there is here; far is near?

Problem with this is the “time” bit of spacetime. If we could warp spacetime in physical dimensions, we could surely warp (and move through) time. Then you get all the usual paradoxes and problems with time travel.

So maybe we won’t be able to teleport.

It put me in mind of an Asimov story revolving around te development of a time viewer, that coul view any point aroun the world at any time in the past. The implication of course was that if you take a small enough fraction of time, the past is basically the present – so it was real-time surveillance. It’s a totally different thing, I know, but similar in that there are further implications to anything. The obvious might be so awesome we forget to think about them, but they can be important.

Statistical data collected by Statpress SEOlution (blogcraft).