So. My wife and I were in Sydney today, and happened upon this: Anti-Islam film protests erupt in Sydney | SBS World News
The protest was against the US, in response to the recent anti-Islam film produced by some right-wing Christian group in the USA. Unfortunately instead of reacting in an adult fashion we have statements like this:
“They have no right to mock our prophet.”
And banners like this:
“Behead all those who insult the Prophet”
Offence. Entitlement. Arrogance.
Religion.
Let me be clear: while I truly do believe our species would be better off without religion, and I have absolutely no automatic respect for any religion, if someone wishes to believe in one, I recognise that it is their business, and not mine.
However…
The fact that they believe something absolutely does not mean that they are entitled to others’ respect for that belief, or to have that belief protected from mockery or insult. Yes, it may well be rude and uncouth to go around insulting someone’s religion, but personally I think calling for the mocker to be beheaded is a whole other level of uncouth.
I think the level of arrogance and entitlement in the notion that one’s religious belief must be respected, and never mocked – purely because it is one’s religious belief – is pretty ugly.
And honestly, of all the things about the US and its behaviour in the Middle East and towards the Muslim world in general that are seriously worth protesting, they pick on some idiotic group of Christian fundies mocking Mohammed? Rly? That’s what’s most important? Makes it kind of easy to distract from the real issues then, doesn’t it? Draw a bad cartoon of Mohammed or something, and then all the other actually bad stuff gets ignored.
Because mocking.
Just further confirms my opinion that we’d all be better off without any religions.
What I’d Like to Have Written About Fred Nile
Fred Nile, the National President of the Christian Democrat party, is a loathsome little weasel indeed (that’s not what I’d like to have written; it’s what I have written). He is so blindly obsessed with preventing the teaching to children of philosophical discourse about ethics that he has abandoned any pretence of behaving like a politician should – even bearing in mind my admittedly cynical view that every politician in existence is little better than pond scum when it comes to ethical or principled behaviour.
Anyway…
In a move akin to the way Pharmac in New Zealand will refuse to subsidise one medication unless the company drops the price on a wholly unrelated product, Nile is withholding support for a piece of Industrial Relations legislation. He is hoping to use his support as leverage to force the NSW State Government to repeal the law establishing ethics classes as an alternative to Scripture classes.
Weasel.
There are many things I would like to say to and about Nile – and I would happily say them to his face. However, Dr Simon Longstaff, executive director of the St James Ethics Centre in an opinion piece in the Sydney Morning Herald, has put everything I would like to say in much more eloquent form, with not one single expletive (which I personally find most impressive, as Fred Nile is most expletogenic).
I particularly liked the way Longstaff elucidated the ethical principles Nile is displaying:
Fred Nile, go the hell away. Please. Go back into your little desert-bound bronze age immoral closed-minded, blinkered, fear-ridden worldview, and leave the 21st Century the hell alone.
Most especially: leave my kids alone!